Talent Attraction

The world of Community Management is changing.....at least ours is.

The title Community Manager didn't even exist 5 years ago, well it did but in a totally different industry.  Anyway, the world of online, digital, or "inbound" marketing is evolving everyday, every hour, and even sometimes within minutes.  One of the ways we try to keep up with the trends is by having the best people working on the things they enjoy the most.  In this case we're speaking of Community Managers.  Not just social media managers, but true authentic "Community" Managers.  It's a true DNA match for a PeopleOps Community Manager to be architecting and maintaining talent communities.  Here's a graphic describing the difference. 
 

cm.png

2013 Recruiting Predictions, a preview to a Blogging4jobs post

Recruiting Predictions for 2013 and Beyond 

  It’s already that time of year again to make some predictions about what’s in store for next year.  With 2012 coming to a close, let’s look back at some of the things that changed the recruiting landscape.  More social media sites have entered our recruiting peripheral vision, like Pinterest.  We have started to take Facebook more seriously as a tool to tap into generation Y talent.  We have also noticed a proliferation of next generation recruiting tools such as RemarkableHire, TalentBin, and The Resumator.   Here are a hand full of my predictions for 2013:

 

easelly_visual.jpg

My recent post on Blogging4Jobs: 10 Common Social Recruiting & Internet Sourcing Myths BUSTED

Jonah Manning at Lunch with DriveThruHR

 
 
 

Listen to internet radio with DriveThru HR on Blog Talk Radio

@jonahmanning ....Jonah Manning visits with Bryan Wempen and William Tincup about HR and whatever else keeps him up at night with Corporate organizations.

DriveThruHR more than not talks about Human Resources with HR professionals every day at lunch time for 30 minutes. Give us a listen at (347) 996-5600 and share your thoughts on twitter using #dthr or @drivethruhr. We talk HR along with lots of clever bantor and thoughts every day at 12 Noon Central time at "DTHR".

Listen to internet radio with Wempen and Tincupon Blog Talk Radio

Listen to

internet radio

with

DriveThru HR

on Blog Talk Radio

 

The Slow Agonizing Death of the Job Post

Why the professional job post is dead:
 

job.png


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The $50k and up professional job postings are soon to be completely obsolete as job searching becomes a more social process.  The only way for this to not become a reality is if Applicant Tracking Systems stop existing as the black hole of recruiting, and  start becoming real people responding to candidates.  The result comes from the fact that social media is not only changing it for the candidate, but for the recruiting function as well. 

Historically, 2% of online applicants at any tier-one technology firm result in an actual hire.  However, the highest ratio of candidate to hire is from employee referral.  By making job searching social, the theory is that it will help filter down the number of applicants and lift up the number of referred applicants.  

If this occurs, and I believe it will, the number of overall applicants will be manageable. Additionally, because they are going to be likely tied to an internal team member, managing that interaction from a human perspective will be organic.  

So how does this tie into the Method Manifesto?  It’s the acknowledgment that sourcing is no longer just about building a pipeline for the present.  More and more companies want a pipeline of cultivated candidates from likely skill sets, so when the inevitable role opens, the staffing department is ready to go.

How do you do that?  Sensing this has been coming, major job boards are already touting that you can use their platforms to build your candidate pool.  I believe this is bogus, because a pool of candidates primarily with just active seekers seems highly ineffective.  I am not saying active seekers cannot be good employees, of course they can, but by the vary nature of the action they are seeking when you are ready they will likely not be.  The key is to develop these networks with potential candidates based strictly on profile with a mix of active and passive personalities.

So why are job boards dead?  In the next couple years, a new post in pushed candidates will respond, likely because of retweets and network referrals, not because they saw the job on a job board.  Under $50k job opportunities, excluding internships, will be business as usual...for now. 

  

The Method Sourcer

  Some say ‘true candidate sourcing’ is the intersection of where the art and science of recruiting meet.  Unfortunately, sourcing is too broad of a term for that description. In fact, even to this day I regularly spend time teaching a new client what ‘our’ definition of sourcing means.  

    The Method Sourcer utilizes different techniques to find and locate the best talent.  Early in my career, after selling my previously built name generation company, I was fortunate enough to be hired by an emerging juggernaut in the hybrid RPO space.  As a passionate name generator, I had grown jaded with the realization that the perception of my success or failure derived not by the quality of my research, but often by the quality of the sourcer or recruiter making the calls.  I was eager to learn the rest of the cycle; an RPO environment would be a perfect ‘sand box’ to test what I felt in my gut. 

      After entertaining their training program and learning the traditional recruiting method I was left with just one repeating phrase “why in the hell are you doing it that way?”  The traditional recruiting method is to scour job boards; reading endless resumes, finding what candidate the recruiter feels is on the money, calling them, leaving numerous voicemails, and maybe ending up with 2 or 3 candidates in a day. This process seemed very inefficient, and defeated the intent of what sourcing SHOULD be.  Method Sourcing is very different. Here are the five core principles of a Method Sourcer:

Leverage the Candidate 

      I started to develop what it was to be “the Method.”  The concept of this was to leverage the sourcers’ time by allowing the candidate to screen themselves.  The theory was, if the sourcer could get within a few percentage points of accuracy based on the job requirements, and allow the candidates to review and self evaluate on the must haves, they would respond if it seemed appropriate.  This way the sourcers are only spending time on the phone screening the candidates that are interested and relatively qualified, rather than very generalized screening. 

   
Understanding the Language of Attraction Marketing 

    We are not talking about the same (and often lame) methods of writing job posts.   The content of the message to the candidate must be compelling, authentic, and action oriented:

  My client is seeking a world class _________ (this is a both a complement and a challenge to the candidate), for their global headquarters in ___________. (If the city is not ideal place a complementing adjective prior to mentioning)

  I ran across your profile as someone whom could potentially contribute to _________’s EXPLODING growth.  (positive growth is a big deal right now, during times of peak hiring substitute this line with ‘I ran across your profile as someone knowledgable in this space) 
         Then add in your closing action line.  This type of marketing allows the company to expand with the greatest candidates possible, and allows the candidates to obtain a greater understanding of why they are needed at the company.

Keeping search simple 

   When the sourcer is gathering the search requirements (preferably from the hiring manager directly) it is important to focus not only on the requirement itself,  but the three to five ‘must haves’ that the hiring manager is looking for.  This is common knowledge for a sourcer or a recruiter.  What is not common knowledge, however, is to then begin to question the hiring manager why each of those ‘must haves’ are critical to the company.  For example, a hiring manager that needs an engineer searches only for a candidate with a computer science degree from a top 20 school.  One may think that hiring manager is perhaps being unreasonable.  However, after questioning you realize that what the hiring manager is looking for is a solid CS fundamental track that is only emphasized at the the top 20 schools during the early parts of their educational track.  

   Understanding the ‘why’ is often more important then understanding the ‘what’.  When searches get hard (and often they do) this is the information you will be able to circle back to for inspiration.  

     Next, you want to understand what alternative titles these candidate could be called.  Working with the candidate as well as the company to find the best suited position title can be beneficial for both the company and the candidate. Finally, obtaining a verified list of competitors.  Simply then construct your strings with the associated “must haves” from people with those titles from those companies.  Voila. 

Essential Tools for The Job:

   A Mac, an iPhone, and an iPad.  Why?  Everything just works. In my experience, my computer never crashes, my emails and files are always synced, and it out performs when running multiple softwares at the same time, versus my PC running windows.  

    A linkedin PRO and Linkedin Recruiter Account.  Why?  Because building a long term network with your Linkedin Pro account while using the Linkedin Recruiter account to blast inMails is more effective than alternative methods.

     A recruiting/enterprise branchout account beyond Facebook  Why?  Because while Facebook has everyone, it is an absolutely terrible mechanism when trying to search professionally.  Additionally, every candidate has access to detailed information on Facebook, such as photos.  Branchout makes it possible to keep your business and personal world separate while making searching through Facebook actually productive. 

     Access to one job board (which one does not matter).  Why?  Because there are good candidates on there too, and they can get the ball rolling while you are waiting on passive candidates to put their resumes together. 

5) Kill the F&%*$&g reports please! 

I get it, data is king.  In order for sourcers to prove their worth, they have to have data.  Why is this?  Normally it’s because the recruiters are either terrible at what they do, or are too competitive and consequentially do not give the sourcers candidates good play.   The sign of a method sourcer is that he or she will not want to do reports..why?  Our DNA is not content, it’s CONTEXT.  Every minute we spend in repetitive meetings or putting together multi-color reports to explain why it takes 150 candidates for the recruiter to be able to get the hiring manager to hire someone is the time that we could, would, and should be spending finding more candidates.   Yes, I am ranting! 

  

How Social Media is Changing the Staffing Game from the Ground Up

Disruption seems to be the name of the game in both social media and the collective business world.  From Apple completely changing the game for record companies to smaller disruptions like how we invoice, get merchant accounts, or pretty soon even how we bank.
 

  

ground.png

Social Media disruption has also spread into other areas like customer service.  Forcing companies to suddenly be more accountable.  Why should we expect anything less to happen in staffing.  

I have been beating this drum for the better part of a year that the coming storm for recruiting is almost here.  Staffing serves as the trojan horse for marketing.  Why?  No other department, including customer service, touches more influential people every day then your front line recruiters.  Its not the candidates that you hire that is the concern, its the average of 100+ per requirement that you do not hire.  How was that candidate treated, where they followed up with, where they dismissed with a simple form letter ,etc.  Based on my experience with a large pool of Fortune 1000s plus many startups, yes..in many cases this is exactly what happens every day.


So we are living in the age when the most obscure introvert living in his Mom’s basement in Nebraska can create a social media nightmare for a fast food chain...doesn’t this mean the candidate that was just dismissed whom for all intents and purposes is vastly more connected, credible, and articulate couldn’t light your brand up online?  

The answer I hear most (from the largest of companies) is we do not have the resource to scale like that.  When companies are spending hundreds of dollars per post on paid job postings that for the sweeping majority do not produce candidates they are likely to hire anyway, why not convert some of that money into real jobs for people to be able to scale that.  Think of every dismissed candidate as an opportunity, because remember in today’s marketing Candidates are also Customers! 

  

Understanding the Context of the Candidate

   Why there is such a disconnect in understanding that the consumers ARE the candidates.  If you want to know the best way to reach candidates, look at what the best consumer companies are doing.  

   Take for instance, Apple.  They are among the top brands in cult-like following and Apple is the king of subtle disruptions.  This past March (2011), I was at South By Southwest (SXSW) when Apple was launching the iPad2.  SXSW brings together some of the most forward thinking social media and tech companies. They discuss cutting edge and even sometimes barely existing technologies.  Apple did not have a booth or a logo at SXSW.  What they DID have is a pop up store in downtown Austin ,about 4 blocks away from SXSW.  So, the day the iPad2 launched, guess where a ton of people were? You got it! They were not in breakout sessions that they or their companies paid hundreds, if not thousands of dollars for them to be at.  Rather, they were standing in line, a hundred people deep, tweeting away about the iPad2.  Apple won SXSW without even being there.  
 

gerg.png

  Alright, so what is the connection to this anecdote and the consumer and candidate?  Priority.  Keep in mind, the people waiting in line at the pop up mac store were not just run of the mill consumers. These were the normally passive candidates within the social media space that recruiters fight over on Linkedin and other online platforms.  So why were they in line?  Because they wanted an iPad2.  Apple knew there ultra-targeted customers would likely be at SXSW so they made it easy for them to get there hands on one.  Consumers crave authenticity, relevance, solid actual results, and low barrier’s of entry.  That same consumer is also your next great hire.  

How do you create a recruiting context that matches this culture? 

  1. Be Authentic:  Kill the corporate vomit that is on the job requirements.  Write what you would want to read.  Why your company is cool, why you have good people, what you are really looking for, and why YOU think they should be interested.  Couple that with a quick YouTube interview with the hiring manager talking about the requirement... unedited.  
  2. Is it a Good Job:  If you are trying to pitch a mediocre job then go back and make it not mediocre.  You do not have to pay top of market to win the day but if you want the guy at your competitors, you need to ask yourself why would someone leave to come to you.  If your answer is, because my company is better, then you have lost.  It HAS to be because my job is better, and if it's not, you need to make it better.
  3. Lower the Barriers of Entry: Does your Applicant Tracking System suck?  The answer is most likely yes.  I understand that due to compliance laws, we have to have some forms of applications.  However, you should make the application process, at least on the front end, something they can do with a simple email or maybe logging in to use their Linkedin resume-like profile.  Oh and while I am at it, please start taking LI profiles as resumes, its good enough! 

5 Must-Have Characteristics of a Recruiting/Sourcing Vendor

Sourcing and recruiting for businesses are critical, hard to find skill sets that takes time. It also takes a lot of domain knowledge. It can be hard for businesses to find the necessary time or internal resources to learn and/or implement winning passive sourcing efforts and authentic social media messaging (to name a couple) for themselves. In these cases, businesses can reach out to a third-party agency to manage their candidate development efforts. Consider these 5 must-have characteristics when evaluating an agency partnership.

1. The Right Services

Saying "agency" is really a disservice to the Talent Acquisition industry.  The question is what is your need?  Do you need to hire lots and lots of standard qualification employees? Then a U.S. based RPO might be right for you.  Do you have one critical hire you need to make but have a super strict budget? Then a contingency agency could be the right call.  Maybe you have a fairly consistent need for a tier 1 candidate pipeline for a specific business group that complains a lot? That could be when you tap the services of a tactical sourcing team like PeopleOps.

2. A Clear Process

Project results on whitepapers and company case studies are great, but the real value of an agency's involvement will be in how they put, not only how they fill the business critical roles, but the additional added value of how they work with the hiring authorities.  Recruiting or Sourcing agencies should be able to clearly lay out and explain the candidate development methodology for prospective clients. Being able to clearly show you the order in which things need to happen and the amount of time and resources required at each step. This will indicate that the agency has delivered ROI to clients before. Thus, you will also be able to infer that it has the game plan to do it again for your company.

3. An Emphasis on Measurement

Words like "metrics", "benchmarks" and "analytics" should be peppered throughout your prospective agency's pitch. Progress made toward your goals should to be measured at every step of the way, and a recruiting agency worth its weight will be able to track all campaigns, direct sourcing efforts, candidate flow and report on performance regularly. You have goals. You are trying to meet those goals by hiring the agency. Therefore, it should be as focused as you are, charting success in an undeniable, data-driven way. 

4. Strong Project Management Skills

Recruiting is fueled by the creation of remarkable content aimed at your ideal candidates, compelling direct sourcing initiatives, and authentic messaging. In order to be successful, good recruiting/sourcing agencies will need to get inside your hiring managers head to build that content and learn about that dream candidate. Do the agencies you're considering have the process and communication skills to make you think they will make reasonable and realistic requests of your hiring authorities? Also, have they set clear expectations around what each step in the candidate development and attraction process will require in terms of time and resources? Do you get the impression that they can manage campaigns with lots of moving parts? A good agency will make your life easier; not the opposite.

5. An Online Presence Optimized for Top Talent

Does the agency you're considering blog regularly? What is its own internal recruiting initiatives like? Are there optimized landing pages and premium content offers throughout its site? An effective recruiting or sourcing agency should be its own best case study. Think twice about engaging with a recruiting firm that doesn't make the services it sells a priority for its own business.

 

Inspired Search

   Marketing department of all sizes have been recently talking about the transition of the context of marketing and how it gets its message to audiences.  The old montage of "stack it high and let it fly" is dead and gone.  Marketing teams are instead crafting hundreds, if not thousands, of messages that are now being delivered to small niche groups.

   What is most interesting is understanding why this shift is a must for marketing companies.  This is because, due to the absolute inundation of content, consumers authenticity radars have also become more evolved. Take, for instance, when companies try to cleverly craft YouTube videos that look like it was generated by real people, but was actually done by a production company and then they try to make that video go viral. The consumers' comment strings will tell the whole story.

   Here is the interesting thing, consumers are also candidates.  This means that the same canned messaging, job posts, and the corporate speak embedded in the job description are not going to cut it with the candidates you often are seeking.  I am aware that the candidate application pools often get overwhelming results in terms of applicants. However the applicant to hire ratios at most top companies is less then 3% and falling.  Why is this?  The best candidates are often not applying to the jobs.  Why? They are not looking at the promoted Tweets because it is not that interesting to them.

     So what is the cure? It's really a one-two punch.  You have to have a real, authentic, direct message.  When I say "You", it's whomever your job pitch man is: sourcer, recruiter, hiring manager, internal employee, etc.  Most, if not all, companies have this.  So why the lackluster results?  Is your pitchman inspired?  I am not talking about the corporate Kool-Aid drinking 'Yes Men.'  Your pitchman needs to be legitimately into the company...like the product, the services, what your company is working on, they buy into the big picture, or just basically give a rip about the organization.  Why does this matter?  It's the only way the messaging is going to resonate. Sometimes it's not what you say, but how you say it.  I hope whomever your pitchman is, they care about the company. If not, I hope you can quickly find someone who does. 

Do you legitimately care about the company you represent?  If you don't, maybe it's time you too become inspired.

 

4 ways to use Twitter to find great candidates

73% of Staffing Leadership believe using consumer focused social media tools like Twitter or Facebook has little effect on increasing their organizations' top line candidates or filling positions with adequate talent. Only you can change this misconception. Using social media to bring in great talent isn't a cost center, it's a catalyst for growth.
 

Vintage-Twitter-resized-600.png

Here are 4 easy ways you can use Twitter to start getting better candidates:

  1. Listen:  From my perspective Twitter is often miss conceived as a content distribution tool.  In my opinion it is far more useful as a listening tool.  Your recruiters or sourcers can set up live searches around specific search terms, like "ios developer" OR "flight dynamics" or "objective-c".  The more specific you can get the less 'noise' you will have to filter through.  Using free tools like Tweetdeck, you can quickly set up numerous searches that will alow you to engage with people talking about your specific topics...odds are these people are candidates.
  2. Be Authentic: If you are looking for Computer Science engineers, Accountants, Management Consultants, or whatever it may be... do not populate your tweets with endless news feeds and other spammy garbage.  Interview your hiring managers, engage in industry blogs, and tweet relevant information about your open role, about the department it reports to, about the people in the department, etc.  The more authentic you can be, the better the chance of you landing the passive candidate that sees you but has yet to respond.
  3. Leverage the hashtag #:  If you want to take a little more of an aggressive approach, you can used paid Twitter tools like TweetAdder3 that can search all profiles associated with a hashtag.  Why is that imporatant?  Most confrences use hashtags to organize so if you want to find alot of social media enthusiasts you could use #sxsw for South By Southwest...or any other conference.  Great way to troll for solid candidates. 
  4. Respond to everyone:  Everytime someone follows you, everytime someone Re-Tweets something you said, any activity at all ... make sure you engage.  Even if its just to say thank you, engaging with your fledging community will make those new found connections strengthen.  Keep in mind, your search may end, but that community you are building (if done right!) will remain to help you when you need it again. 

5 Reasons Marketing and Recruiting Should Get Married

love-sculpture-resized-600.png

style="color: rgb(56, 56, 56); font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 23px; text-align: left; "> Marketing as we know is going through a dramatic 'shift.' The internet and social media is about to go to college ...and as we know most people start entertaining the idea of marriage about this same time.   Companies are scrambling to take what was a single eloquently crafted message that was delivered to millions and change it into several thousand authentically crafted messages delivered a couple thousand at a time.    Recruiting is no different.   Just like in marketing, social media has massively impacted recruiting.   I have not seen a physical resume on my desk in several years, more and more candidates are using their Linkedin profiles as their pseudo  resume, and candidates can now visible see second and third degree connections into an employer of choice via a number of online communities and clever smart phone apps.  
So what does this mean?   Marketing and Recruiting should really consider getting together ...here is why:


They do life separately 



When your relationship is casual, you maintain your own places. Marketing lives in a cute sublet, and recruiting lives in a downtown loft. They don’t share anything, and they spend time separately. Marketing has girls’ night out and Recruiting has poker night with the guys. Their communication is sporadic at best, and it's obvious they just aren’t on the same page.

They Don’t Share Finances



When Recruiting and Marketing are just in the dating phase, they don’t pool their money. They don’t share expenses, and they don’t leverage economies of scale. For instance, they both pay their own rent and utilities, and they don’t have any family memberships at the gym. Let’s face it: they are wasting a lot of money because they don’t work together. 


They Sound Different

While Marketing and Recruiting are just dating, they don’t sound as if they are on the same page. When I talk to Marketing, she tells me one story, and when I talk to Recruiting, I hear something completely different. Marketing is always interrupting me with her advertising speak, and Recruiting is constantly talking reactionary based on getting "hires" and “budget” that. This is a big challenge for the people around them, especially the people they want to be close to: Candidates and New Customers...oh wait...could those be the same people?

They Don’t Complement Each Other



Before they commit, Marketing and Recruiting's' personalities are totally different. Recruiting is pushy, and Marketing tries to show me how smart she is. She has all the answers. And then there are the spats. Marketing thinks Recruiting is the problem and Recruiting thinks Marketing is the problem. They really need to be a team if they want to achieve their lifelong goals.

5 Reasons Marketing and Recruiting Should Tie the Knot

If Marketing and Recruiting got married, it would transform them from two individuals -- Recruiting and Marketing -- into one family, also known as the Growth Department. Think about it; what if they worked together as a single unit; as a team? Here's what would happen:

1. Matched Messaging: What if Marketing and Recruiting said the same thing? What if their approach was aligned, educating, helping, advising, and counseling all the way through the life cycle? The Recruiting presentation would match the messaging on the website. The Recruiters would be providing educational content and nurturing their candidates, helping passive candidates feel excited and confident about joining your company.

2. Return-on-Investment: What if they pooled their money? They could accomplish so much more. They would eliminate the unproductive things they did like traditional advertising, trade shows, and costly golf outings, and instead focus on the highest return activities like websites, email campaigns, lead nurturing, content creation, and social media management. They might even get on a budget and take their talent attraction to elite levels using a team like PeopleOps to galvanize their efforts. 


3. Integration: What if they lived together, working on challenges and focusing on the single task: getting results? They would understand each other so much better and be a tightly knit, integrated team. Just think about the potential. 


4. Content Collaboration: If they tied the knot, they could do things together like create educational videos that highlighted the hiring manager's so when they finally met their candidates, the candidates already felt like they knew them, liked them, and trusted them. What a warm, friendly feeling that would leave with potential new hires. 


5. Aligned Goals: Most importantly, if they were committed to each other, their goals would be aligned. Their hopes and dreams would now be one. Their Growth department would grow into the Growth Machine their parents hoped and dreamed of when they started their own families. 


While this marriage analogy is cute and I hope it got you to chuckle, this is becoming the new model in businesses of all sizes. The Growth Department is an aligned model where recruiting and marketing are a single team working together to drive one single measure: growth. 

Are your marketing and recruiting teams happily married? What benefits have you experienced from having successfully aligned marketing and recruiting departments?
 
 



Image Credit: jmscottIMD

This blog was a colorful adaptation to a guest post written by Michael Lieberman, cofounder and president of Square 2 Marketing.